Collective Actions

Making good use of undistributed damages from opt-out collective actions to support access to justice

Opt-out collective actions are legal cases brought on behalf of a group affected by anti-competitive behaviour. Claimants are automatically included unless they choose to opt out. When not all eligible claimants claim their share, any funds leftover following a distribution process are known as undistributed damages.

We’re working with legal representatives and funders in a number of cases to ensure any leftover funds are put to good use.

Our role as the prescribed charity

Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, The Access to Justice Foundation is the prescribed charity designated to receive undistributed damages from opt-out collective actions in the UK. This role allows us to improve access to justice by ensuring that even undistributed damages enable access to justice by funding the legal help that people need.

We’ve been recognised for this role several times, including in the Merricks v Mastercard case, the UK’s largest collective action settlement at £200m, where the Tribunal confirmed us as the appropriate recipient for unclaimed funds.

A charity which has as its object the provision of assistance to a very wide range of bodies across the UK to help the disadvantaged pursue or protect their legal rights seems to us an appropriate recipient of residue funds in these proceedings.

Merricks v Mastercard settlement judgment (paragraph 202)

When collective action cases settle or result in unclaimed damages, we act as a backstop, ensuring that no money gets lost and that every pound does meaningful work.

Why this matters

83%

of our end beneficiaries experiencing poverty

40%

rise in demand for our partners services in the past five years

£9100

average saving to Treasury per case by investing in free legal advice

Undistributed damages offer a new funding stream for charities working with marginalised communities who may have been impacted by the issues at the heart of collective action cases.

This model ensures justice reaches beyond the courtroom and into communities, making sure that collective actions deliver lasting benefits to the public.

This is a new and developing area of law and, while several collective actions are now progressing through the Competition Appeal Tribunal, we haven’t yet seen enough cases to establish any clear patterns.

We believe settlements should work similarly to post-trial outcomes, as they do in many other countries, and we’re actively engaging with cases while working alongside key partners across the sector to ensure the regime fulfils its purpose.

Working in partnership

We’re committed to developing a strategic framework that maximises the benefit of undistributed damages. Part of this is building partnerships to ensure we’re building an approach that works for everyone involved, from class representatives and legal teams to consumer advocacy groups and advice organisations.

We collaborate with key sector partners including the Collective Redress Lawyers Association (CORLA), the Association of Consumer Support Organisations, and the Class Representatives Network. 

Recent developments

© 2025 The Access to Justice Foundation, Registered office and correspondence address: The Access to Justice Foundation, 7 Bell Yard, London WC2A 2JR. The Access to Justice Foundation is a company limited by guarantee (No. 6714178) and is a charity registered in England and Wales (No. 1126147) and in Scotland (No. SC048584).
Website by William Joseph