Collective Actions
Opt-out collective actions are legal cases brought on behalf of a group affected by anti-competitive behaviour. Claimants are automatically included unless they choose to opt out. When not all eligible claimants claim their share, any funds leftover following a distribution process are known as undistributed damages.
We’re working with legal representatives and funders in a number of cases to ensure any leftover funds are put to good use.
Our role as the prescribed charity
Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, The Access to Justice Foundation is the prescribed charity designated to receive undistributed damages from opt-out collective actions in the UK. This role allows us to improve access to justice by ensuring that even undistributed damages enable access to justice by funding the legal help that people need.
We’ve been recognised for this role several times, including in the Merricks v Mastercard case, the UK’s largest collective action settlement at £200m, where the Tribunal confirmed us as the appropriate recipient for unclaimed funds.
A charity which has as its object the provision of assistance to a very wide range of bodies across the UK to help the disadvantaged pursue or protect their legal rights seems to us an appropriate recipient of residue funds in these proceedings.
Merricks v Mastercard settlement judgment (paragraph 202)
When collective action cases settle or result in unclaimed damages, we act as a backstop, ensuring that no money gets lost and that every pound does meaningful work.
Why this matters
of our end beneficiaries experiencing poverty
rise in demand for our partners services in the past five years
£
average saving to Treasury per case by investing in free legal advice
Undistributed damages offer a new funding stream for charities working with marginalised communities who may have been impacted by the issues at the heart of collective action cases.
This model ensures justice reaches beyond the courtroom and into communities, making sure that collective actions deliver lasting benefits to the public.
This is a new and developing area of law and, while several collective actions are now progressing through the Competition Appeal Tribunal, we haven’t yet seen enough cases to establish any clear patterns.
We believe settlements should work similarly to post-trial outcomes, as they do in many other countries, and we’re actively engaging with cases while working alongside key partners across the sector to ensure the regime fulfils its purpose.
Working in partnership
We’re committed to developing a strategic framework that maximises the benefit of undistributed damages. Part of this is building partnerships to ensure we’re building an approach that works for everyone involved, from class representatives and legal teams to consumer advocacy groups and advice organisations.
We collaborate with key sector partners including the Collective Redress Lawyers Association (CORLA), the Association of Consumer Support Organisations, and the Class Representatives Network.
Work with us
If you’re involved in collective action litigation or settlement negotiations, we encourage you to include the Foundation in your planning. We’re keen to work with class representatives, claimant legal teams, and Competition Appeal Tribunal stakeholders to ensure the collective actions regime delivers maximum benefit for consumers.
Recent developments
-
Collective Actions Regime Review: Our Response to the Call for Evidence
13 October 2025
It is crucial that collective actions in the UK deliver access to justice.
-
Competition Appeal Tribunal Grants £3.78m to The Access to Justice Foundation
11 September 2025
The Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) has approved a landmark payment to charity in the first Boundary Fares class action (Gutmann v SSWT).
-
Unclaimed damages in Guttman v SW Trains
23 July 2025
The Access to Justice Foundation is pleased to have been invited by the Tribunal to make submissions on how unclaimed funds can have maximum impact.
-
Merricks v Mastercard Settlement
20 May 2025
The Competition Appeal Tribunal has handed down its written judgment along with the collective settlement approval order in the Merricks v Mastercard case
-
Merricks v Mastercard
3 February 2025
We have been given permission to intervene in the settlement approval application in the case of Merricks v Mastercard.